Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Project Censored: Is This Blog Safe?

Internet Privacy and Personal Access at Risk, a section in the book Censored 2011, talks about cyber security over the Internet.


Photo Source

Some of the initial facts that I learned from this section are:

-->Senate Bill 733, which is the Cybersecurity Act of 2009, allows the president to completely shut down the Internet in the state of a national emergency. It also gives him the power to "declare a cyber security emergency with respect to private computer networks, and to do with these networks what it deems necessary to diffuse the attack" (26).

-->“The 1008 FISA amendments also require electronic communication service providers such as AT&T and Verizon to “immediately provide the Government with all information, facilities, or assistance necessary to accomplish the [intelligence] acquisition,” while granting these companies retroactive and prospective immunity against civil suits, state investigations, and criminal prosecution” (27). The government does not need a warrant for this surveillance.

-->“In April 2009, the Obama Justice Department invoked the “state secrets privilege” to bar American citizens from suing the US government for illegally spying on them. It also went even further than the Bush administration by arguing that the US government is completely immune from litigation for illegal spying and can never be sued for surveillance that violates federal privacy laws” (27).



-->“As part of an effort to gather more “open source intelligence,” the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is investing in Visible Technologies, a data-mining company that analyzes the content of social media Web sites. Visible Technologies, which has offices in New York, Seattle, and Boston, was created in 2005, and in 2006 it developed a partnership with WPP, a worldwide communications firm. This company has the capacity to examine over half a million sites per day.” 28



-->“On January 30, 2009, IndyMedia, an alternative online news source, received a subpoena from the Southern District of Indiana Federal Court for the “IP addresses, times, and any other identifying information” of all the site’s visitors on June 25, 2008. IndyMedia was then prohibited from notifying visitors of this release of otherwise private and protected information because disclosure “would impede the investigation being conducted and thereby interfere with the enforcement of the law'”(28).

-->“The Obama administration is also currently working with a group of UN nations on the development of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), “a new intellectual property enforcement treaty” to prevent illegal downloading and copying of songs, movies, pictures, and other legally protected Web content. The new law is being developed in secrecy and might allow government access to personal content on hard drives thought to be in breach of copyright” (28).


Photo Source

-->“Company-issued laptops are also being monitored. Companies usually permit their employees to use such computers for personal purposes as well as for business. However, unbeknownst to the employees, all their private files (such as e-mails, photographs, and financial records_ are being inspected by company techs when the computers are brought in for upgrades or repairs. Consequently, anything the techs deem questionable can be disclosed to management. Further, if the company-issued laptop has a webcam, the employer can use it to eavesdrop on the employee, even if he or she is in the bathroom” (29).

There have also been cases of teachers and school administrators spying on children using school computers via webcam.

3 comments:

  1. This is excellent reporting on a VITAL story of national significance, Heather.

    "National emergency" - what a vague and endlessly malleable term.

    Zoinks.

    The cartoon says it all, aye.

    Are you worries about this?

    Gage

    ReplyDelete
  2. Honestly, I'm not too worried. If people are using the Internet properly, they shouldn't have any concerns of the government tracking their usage. It seems a little ridiculous that companies are not allowed to inform their customers of the surveillance, though.

    I am concerned with the employers viewing their workers via webcam. I think it's an unnecessary worry about their employees, and an invasion of privacy. If their employees are using the work computers, the company should be allowed to track what they do, for the benefit and reputation of the company, but I don't think actually SEEING the person use the computer is necessary.

    ReplyDelete